Thursday, January 31, 2013

Briefing The Case

TITLELeegin Creative Leather Products , Inc v . PSKS , IncFACTSsupplicant Leegin Creative Leather Products , a manufacturer of women s accessories under the brand name Brighton , entered into a vertical minimum price agreements with its retailer , which includes herein respondent , PSKS , Inc . prayerer avers that such price agreements intend to encourage competition among retailers in the areas of customer service and product promotion . However , herein respondent discounted Leegin products below their prescribed minimum price . after being dropped by Leegin as one of its retailers , PSKS d a lawsuit , arguing that Leegin violates Section 1 of the Sherman Act by engaging in anticompetitive price fixing . The District solicit decided in favor of PSKS citing Dr . Miles Medical Co . v . John D . Park Sons Co , which held that authorization price agreements are per se illegal under the Sherman Act . Petitioner , in an appeal to the U .S .
Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth rope , argued that this rule was based on outdated economics and contended that a the rule of reason is a better legal compendium Petitioner further claimed that price minimums will only be held illegal when proven to be anticompetitive . The appellate court command in favor of the district court hence , this petition for certiorariISSUEIs it per se illegal for a manufacturer to passel mandatory minimum prices for its productsRULENo , it is not illegal for a manufacturer to set mandatory minimum prices for its products . Section 1 of the Sherman Act prohibits [e]very stuff , combination in...If you want to get a full essay, dictate it on our website: Orderessay

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my essay .

No comments:

Post a Comment