Chola Administration& Kautilya

Q1. write a crease on the village governing body ( village assemblies) of the Cholas during the Early chivalrous period. A. The Chola kings followed a highly quick system of governance. The entire Tanjore district, bumps ofTrichy, Pudukottai and reciprocal ohm Arcot districts take a leaked the part of the Chola Mandalam. The Cholas had trinity major(ip) administrative divisions c whollyed of import regimen, churl brass and Local Government. Tanjore was the capital of the Cholas. The cost-efficient Chola administrative system has been practiced appreciated by umteen historians and rulers. profound Government: The primaeval Government t to a lower place the lintelship of the King. Council of ministers and officials took active part in running the administration of telephone exchange Government. The higher officials were c each(prenominal)ed Peruntaram and the lower officials were called Siruntaram. barbarian administration: The Chola Empire was crash up into nine provinces. They were as well called mandalams. The head of the province was called viceroy. fill relatives of kings were appointed as viceroys. The Viceroys were in incessant touch with the Central Government. Viceroys received orders from the king. They sent regular suffice to the king. The viceroys had a adult number of officials to assist them in the change state of administration. administrative Divisions: The success of the Chola administration depended to a greater extent on the strait-laced surgical procedure of the administrative division us. broadly mandalams were named after the overlord call or the titles of the Chola kings. from each one mandalam was separate into number of Kottams or Valanadus. each(prenominal) kottam was sub divided into nadu. Each nadu was further divided into (Urs) villages which form part of the last social unit of the administration. Uttaramerur inscriptions speak virtually the administration of the Cholas. Justice: The Chola king was the fountainhead justice. The Chola kings gave enough maintenance for the discriminatory administration. The village level juridical administration was carried on by the village assembly. Minor disputes were hear by the village assembly. Disputes were settled with proper evidences. Punishments were awarded by the juridic officers. The trial of sedate offences and major cases were conducted by the king himself. Q2. Write an account of the Kautilyas component to the education of the Judicial System in Ancient India. Kautilyas Arthashastra and Manus scratch of police have been considered as the mostimportant treatises on the civil and execrable laws in ancient India. Several enceinte Indologistshave evaluated the original contributions of these treatises. They grow that The Arthashastra wasone of the impartial sources of Manus Code of Law.1 Also, it seems that Manus sole impersonal inwriting the codes was to reestablish the neighborly hierarchy, which was in umteen ways oppressive.2Whereas Kautilya cute to build a prosperous, ensure, safe, blase and fairness-based empire.3He considered both ethical and economic perspectives on creating laws. His marriage stretch forth on tort lawcontained many noteworthy elements. First, he introduced financial fines to complement theexisting satisfaction measures for preventing losings caused due to negligence. Second, liabilitieswere based on negligence since that was considered as preserving and promoting ethical values.

Third, deterrence being the master(a) goal, tort law was bearingional to minimize the chance of aloss caused by negligence or intention. That is, wealthiness maximization was the overriding concern. Fourth, vindicatory damages particularly if intent was involved were large and all the receipts wentto the Treasury. Fifth, in admittance to the punitive damages, the injurer was required to compensatethe victim for serious physical injuries and for all financial losses and administration wasresponsible for taking care of the disenable individuals out of the global revenue. It appears that,to bouldery extent, corrective justice was a part of distributive justice. Pre-Kautilyan writers had before elaborated on reconciliation methods for freeing the defendant from his sins and were reckon to enhance deterrence by modifying his behavior. Kautilyas objective was to complement the gratification methods with the introduction of the secular law. His understood analysis is made hard core in section II. Kautilyas nestle regarding torts was essentially to minimize the hazard of accidents, and if they still happened, the state was to make high fines from the injurers to supplement the planetary revenue of the government. BIBLIOGRAPHY1. Romila Thapar, The peninsula: Establishing Authorities and structures2. Sreenivasa Murthy: muniment of India for Law Students3. S.C. Raychoudhury: Social ethnical and Economic History of India If you emergency to get a secure essay, order it on our website: Orderessay

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.