Japanese industry

lacquer was opened to the western United States in 1853 when Admiral Perry sailed into Tokyo Bay and found a republic still in a feudal degree of development. This was a country that had isolated itself rigorously from the rest of the world, scarcely Perry issued an order that lacquer would have to open her markets or baptistry the consequences. This would change the country forever, but it would not be the display case of change the West envisioned. The Japanese culture found a way to satisfy the West while retaining its own style. The Japanese announced that they would open their market, but they also said it could not be done all at once. Foreigners could trade at one of two places, the splendid port of Shimoda or the small fishing port of Hakodate in northern Japan:

This was the first-class honours degree of what would be serve known in later years as "market-opening packages." While thus attempting to limit the extent of foreign intrusion, Japan immediately launched an intensive and historic effort to catch up with the industry and technology of the west (Prestowitz 8).

Foreign experts were hired to come to Japan and transfer the technology and skills they had developed. Japan negotiated trade treaties so that foreigners were prevented from

SCAP operated on the assumption that Japan would be subjected to a series of "economic democratization" policies, and the initial intent was to see to it that Japan did not enjoy a higher economic level than any of the neighboring Asian countries that had been threatened by Japanese aggression. The policy goal of SCAP was "reform," and the ultimate commander was specifically ordered to assume "no compact to maintain particular standards of living in Japan." Economic convalescence was not the primary intent of the occupying forces (Yamamura 1-2). Policy was implemented on four major fronts--restriction of zaibatsu-connected firms, dissolution of holding companies, elimination of luxuriant economic power, and the introduction of an anti-monopoly act.

The reform was to be thorough, and the Japanese parsimoniousness was to be given a competitive economic organize as quickly as possible. The program was drastic--it was not the Japanese way to enforce competition, for instance. However, a large segment of the country welcomed these reform measures, including the Social Democrats and the Communist Party, both of which hailed the program as the best alternative to the complete nationalization measures they had earlier advocated. apprehend unions were newly legalized and had increasing membership roles, and they supported the program. Opposing the onset were the zaibatsu interests and the Conservative Party. However, there as little they could do nether the circumstances, so they chose to cooperate with the occupation authority while hoping for milder actions in the future (Yamamura 3).

The surrender of Japan to the United States after the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945 was described by the emperor as "enduring the unsupportable and suffering what is insufferable," but he asked the Japanese people to do just that when it was clear that there was no other choice. The equipment casualty of surrender included the occupation of Japan by confederate military forces, assurances that
Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.