Gm Returns to South Africa 10 Years After Independence

Peter Agwa Individual Question Analysis GM returns to South Africa 10 years after end of apartheid How can remote firms equilibrize their strategic interests and their social responsibility when faced with similar situations? I think this is a business strategic interest versus a social responsibility, which is in new(prenominal) words an ethical issue. nearly companies In GMs position were leaving South Africa because they valued to draw the South African government into abolishing its apartheid ways and force them to adapt a democratic system. Most transnationals are vainglorious enough to affect a countries economy either by joining the economy or by withdrawing from the economy. When a foreign company pulls out as is in the case of GM, they are sending a strong message not precisely to the awkward that they are pulling out from, but to the outside(a) community and whole introduction. So by doing this a multinational company would be achieving several results. 1. they would be letting the world know that they do not support apartheid. This is likely to plus the sale of the companies products in other countries that also are against apartheid. 2.

They would be sending a message to the government and telling them that they do not agree with their apartheid policies and rule, and this would force the government to think on their stance on apartheid because no government would like to stick out its foreign business, and also if other companies were to do the same amour it would definitely cripple the countrys economy. 3. They would be enlightening other companies that had the desire to start new business in the country to change their mind and take their business somewhere else. If you requisite to get a full essay, order it on our website: Orderessay

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my essay .