Argumentative Essay

Student NameInstructor NameAssignmentDateThe Right to MonitorIn The Right to Be Let unaccompanied author Barry Glazer attempts to convince readers that the American giving medication activity is overstepping its boundaries and obstructive on the rights of citizens . His main personal credit line is that government enforce[s] regulations that constrain our lives and crusade our freedoms Glazer considers such actions as sobriety checkpoints and building permits as nothing but governmental red tape and inconveniences and invasion of rights for citizens much like , and including , himselfHowever , are the things that Glazer complaining about(predicate) re tout ensembley that big of deal in the larger dodge of things ? Are his points valid ? Are civil rights , guaranteed rights under our makeup and vizor of Rights being denied or abused by government officials and police officers ? I m sure that we could easily say yes in several instances that we personally know of , as Glazer has make , but in the larger scheme of things , if analyzed , are governmental regulations really that big of a deal or does their existence actually help to keep the freedoms that we are guaranteed in placeGlazer states , There is no reason for the government to interfere in our lives if our behavior does not adversely affect others if on that point is no immediate necessity for such interference First of all , the sentence does not even make much sense . Secondly , there is a point here , I believe , and that is that Glazer believes that the government should not interfere in a private citizens life if that person s behavior does not warrant it . Then he goes on to provide the illustration of a terminally ill person wanting to displume suicide . How does this action not affect any iodine ? How does ending one owns life not warrant action by soulfulness ?

If the government were NOT to act on something of this caliber , it would be ridiculed , sued , and hung out to dry since one of the functions of the government is to protect its hatful . Keeping them alive certainly seems to be vital in this process , so Glazer s argument that I should be allowed to kill myself certainly sets his argument up to be questionedThe close point that Glazer makes to support his overall argument is that the government should also stay out of an individual s life if there is no reason to believe he is doing wrong . The Bill of Rights protects us from unlawful searches and seizures Glazer then goes on to recollect an incident of sobriety check point procedures to back up this point . The weakness in this particular part of the argument falls within the realm of common senseThe police do have the right to pull someone over if they believe that that particular individual poses a threat to other dealing or if there is probable cause . With drunken operate being on the top of list of needless deaths , to a greater extent people actually benefit from this practice than are inconvenienced or bothered by the embarrassment of performing tricks...If you want to feature a full essay, order it on our website: Orderessay

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my essay .