Social Psychology 360 Final Exam

Social Psychology 360 Final ExamSocial Psychology 360 Final ExamQuestion 1The supposal of the Festinger-Carlsmith experiment is that dissonance occurs when you divert or go against something that you look at into instead you follow the opposite of your belief ADDIN EN .CITE FestingerLeon FestingerJames M CarlsmithCognitive Consequences of Forced ComplianceJournal of Abnormal and Social PsychologyJournal of Abnormal and Social Psychology203-210No 581959http /psychclassics .yorku .ca /Festinger /Classics in the History of PsychologyChristopher D . GreenApril 14 2007 (Festinger Carlsmith 1959 . Another flavour tackled is that harmoniousness happens when you rationalize or cut sustain on your actions . That is why a person s action needs to be in line with their beliefs consistency is a very important aspect to consider here . They hypothesized that the amount of reward doesn t reciprocate what a person says about an activityThe savants in the Festinger-Carlsmith experiment were made to do or perform monotonous meaningless proletariats like turn of events of pegs quarter turns or putting something in containers or a tray then eventually emptying it then putting it back again , doing so a number of times more(prenominal) . These were seemingly tiresome and take aim no sense at all , boring most of the students performing the experiments . It is the main steer of the experiment : so that the students would find the experiment not sport to do at allWhen it comes to the control-group experiment , the publications were not briefed that this would be a measure of performance experiment . They went straight to another room to be interviewed , while in the other experimental subjects have been given either a 1 or a 20 dollars so that they will persuade or convert the next subject . That next subject was just a bluff , a part of the actual experiment , since the student was not aw be that he was actually the experimental subject .

He was just asked to replace an imaginary staff that was supposititious to be the one doing the taskThe independent variable was the senselessness of the task at hand which bores the students or the test subjects . This could also be changed as how enjoyable the tasks were to the subjects . Meanwhile , the dependent variable was the amout of payment they get from doing the task , either 1 or 20 as paymentThe hypothesis was evidently supported by the findings since it resulted to the pocket-size reward group which received a 1 remuneration has persuaded themselves that the task that was given to them was actually enjoyable , thus having the identical prediction as what the dissonance reduction theory would predictQuestion 2When it comes to witness accounts , psychologists testify in courts and court proceedings regarding the eyewitness warehousing research Testimonies basing on prejudicial rather than probative are said to be inconsistent , thus they shouldn t be use or allowed in trial courts ADDIN EN .CITE EbbesenEbbe B EbbesenVladimir J KonecniEyewitness Memory Research : Probative v . Prejudicial Value2007April 131997University of calcium , San Diegohttp /psy .ucsd .edu eebbesen prejvprob .html (Ebbesen Konecni , 1997 . Eyewitness identification proves much...If you want to get a all-encompassing essay, order it on our website: Orderessay

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my essay .