When members of a separate go into the crowd knowing mavin another, they bring with them the history of their relationship with one another; this influences the dynamics of the group. In this situation, the members were selected based on their put array. All of the group members are nurses, and they had some acquaintance with one another prior to the group put, although none would refer to the others at that point as friends. While not strictly a random selection method, this was also not a group which came together with long shared personal histories.
The seating arrangement selection method meant that there were no strong bonds effected prior to forming the group. This meant that individuals learned about distributively other, including the various abilities that severally person brought to the group, as the group developed and evolved. As the project was discussed and various objectives were discussed, the dynamics and personalities of the various members began to emerge, and members were able to avoid work from preconceived notions about other members.
However, if the group had been formed with individuals who knew each other better, it is possible that the work would have proceeded more
The member communication styles helped the group in its productivity. Amy has a communication style which is conciliatory and sensitive while Barbara's style is more direct (approaching confrontational at times). Virginia's style is little extreme than either of these, and she tends to be more reserved and to try more carefully than the other two members. As a result, Virginia's contributions tended to be well-thought out and subject to nearly immediate support, although they capacity later be clarified and refined by Amy and Barbara (and tied(p) Virginia).
Overall Performance v. Group Purpose
Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.
No comments:
Post a Comment