evening though Moran asserts he just doesn't get it, from a suss out of the American Network/cable, periodicals, and Internet coverage of the 2002 Olympics one efficacy think they were watching a bloated red, white, and blue pep rally. The Olympics ar supposed to glorify the athletes and the essence of playing periods and all that is good about them. However, these particular Olympics took on greater significance for many Americans receivable to the terrorist attacks. As one American journalist reports, "Olympic gainicials already have visions of emotional U.S. athletes standing atop medal podiums, belt out out the national anthem, tears streaking their cheeks as they watch old Glory ascend" (Shipley D01).
As a form of joint mourning for those lost in the terrorist attacks and a means of joint celebration over American ideals, it is hard to remove the emotions from phratry 11, 2002, from such Internationally broadcast events taking place on U.S. soil. Still, red, white, and blue fervor dominated the Olympic Games instead of an case to remain value-neutral. Michael Elliott, writing in Time, notes about U.S. televised coverage of the games, "If the sign TV coverage of the Olympics is a guide, Old Glory allow be stenciled on every second sn
Anonymous. Olympic coverage on the Internet goes off the beaten track. St. Louis Post-Dispatch. The Associated Press, Feb 8, 2002, D2.
Garrioch, B. U.S. vs. Germany. The Ottawa Sun. Feb 20, 2002: 32.
Ward, B. Russians say West perpetuates bias. The Tampa Tribune. Feb 15, 2002: 8.
Campos, P. Spectacle, not sport at games. Denver Rocky Mountain News. Feb 19, 2002: 30A.
If we try to reclaim a value-neutral country or media coverage of the Winter Games in 2002, we must look to Great Britain. Many countries devoted clear sites to coverage of the Olympic Games, the athletes, and the episodes and issues related to them. ESPN, ABC, NBC, CBS, The New York Times, The Washington Post, the States Today, the Los Angeles Times, and other American media hosted electronic network sites.
However, only the British air System's (BBC) site is value-neutral, with all of those mentioned above highlighting American flags, American athletes, and American events on their sites. Not so with the BBC. There ar not only no attempts at flag-waving on the site, but not even British Athletes are effrontery priority over any others. As The Associated Press reported, "For a truly international perspective, try the British Broadcasting Corp. Web site. Andrew Thompson, head of new media for BBC Sports, said coverage of British stars and victories exit be secondary" (Olympic D2).
In conclusion, there can be no denying that the American media coverage of the 2002 Winter Olympics was biased in favor of American ideals, symbols, and in homage and tribute to folk 11, 2002. From the notorious nationalism witnessed by Hitler's Olympic spectacle in 1936 to our profess heavily nationalistic portrayal of the games in 2002, many experts on Games coverage argue that there are few countries who present the games that do not fall off the value-neutral wagon. As capital of Minnesota Campos (30A) reminds us, "The Olympics, and in particular the media's coverage of them, regularly allow considerations of small-minded nationali
Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.
No comments:
Post a Comment