Mass Media Coverage

When analyzing the nature of reporting on an election issue, it is important to consider each article in the chronological order in which they appeared to the readership.

The first article, which appeared in the "This human being" section on page 2.Z.1, a "Special member: The Chronicle's Voter Handbook for Election '94," ran on Sunday, October 23 and was pen by Chronicle staff writer, Susan Yoachum (1994). The title of the article is " fright and Loathing in the Magic Kingdom/Disillusioned with governance and frustrated by their elected officials, atomic number 20ns are likely to acquittance their anger at the polls -- if they b different to vote at all." Appearing in a "special section" distinctly intended to "inform" readers on election issues, Yoachum (1994) asserts from the beginning that the California electorate "feels duped" (para.2). In explaining that polls indicate that Americans hadn't gotten the kind of change they pass judgment when they elected Bill Clinton in the 1992 Presidential election, Yoachum (1994) argues that their frustration was transforming them into an electorate that was "'angry and self-absorbed'" (para. 6). This comment came from pollster Andrew Kohut, director of the Times Mirror Center for the citizenry and the Press, a seemingly reliable source that lends credibility to Yoachum assertion. Yoachum (1994) goes on to make some sweeping gen

Arizona Republic. (2004, October 7). 4 Experts Assess the Effects of Prop. 200. The Arizona Republic. [Electronic version] Retrieved on skirt 17, 2005 from http://www.azcentral.com/ news/election/special2/articles/

Williams, I. (1994, November 10). Prop. 187 Challenged in tourist administration/Demonstrators Protest Passage. The San Francisco Chronicle, p.A1.

The examination of these three articles, in addition to the other articles initially screened for this study, reveal two interesting conclusions regarding the reporting on Proposition 187 for the San Francisco Chronicle: 1) Every editorial, and the vast majority of the "news" stories that were printed regarding Proposition 187 were grossly anti-187; and 2) Coverage of 187 became increasingly more anti-187 as pre-election polls continually indicated weakening support for the measure, but it was solely after the election and the people of California, and so the readership of The Chronicle, affirmed the anti-illegal immigration measure, that the newspaper suddenly changed its tone to one less faultfinding of Proposition 187 and its supporters.

Crawford, A. & Wingett, Y. Judge Clears Prop. 200 for Vote. (2004, October 29). The Arizona Republic. [Electronic version] Retrieved on March 17, 2005 from http://www.azcentral.com/news/election/

Saunders, D. (1994, October 26). 187: The Lawsuit Proposition. The San Francisco Chronicle, p.A23.

Finally, a one-third article titled, "Prop.187 Challenged in Court/Demonstrators Protest Passage," was written by Isabel Williams appeared on the front page, A1. The article has a seemingly (and surprisingly) objective tone on first examination, but the sources Williams used in reporting "both sides of the issue" reveal her bias -- this conviction in a pro-187 direction. In reporting the pro-187 side of the court battle raging over the recently approved initiative, Williams (1994) quotes sources much(prenominal) as then-Governor Pete Wilson and U.S. Rep. Dana Rohrbacher (R-Huntington Beach). On the contra
Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.